Partners

Abstract:
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is recognized by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) of macrophages triggering production of pro-inflammatory mediators. One of the factors determining the magnitude of responses to LPS, which may even lead to life-threatening septic shock, is the cell surface abundance of TLR4. However, quantitation of the surface TLR4 is difficult due to the low level of receptor expression. To develop a method of TLR4 assessment, we labeled the receptor on the cell surface with a rabbit antibody followed by either anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G–fluorescein isothiocyanate (IgG–FITC) for flow cytometry or with anti-rabbit IgG–peroxidase for a cellular enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Alternatively, the anti-TLR4 antibody was detected by anti-rabbit IgG labeled with 125I. Flow cytometry did not allow detection of TLR4 on the surface of J774 cells or human macrophages. In contrast, application of cellular ELISA or the radiolabeling technique combined with effective blockage of nonspecific binding of antibodies provided TLR4-specific signals. The level of TLR4 on the surface of J774 cells did not change on treatment with 1–100 ng/ml LPS; however, it was reduced by approximately 30–40% after 2 h of treatment with 1 μg/ml LPS. These data indicate that down-regulation of surface TLR4 can serve as a means of negative regulation of cell responses toward high doses of LPS.

Keywords:
Lipopolysaccharide, Toll-like receptor 4, ELISA, Radiolabeling, Flow cytometry

Abstract:
LPS is a constituent of cell walls of Gram-negative bacteria that, acting through the CD14/TLR4 receptor complex, causes strong proinflammatory activation of macrophages. In murine peritoneal macrophages and J774 cells, LPS at 1-2 ng/ml induced maximal TNF-α and MIP-2 release, and higher LPS concentrations were less effective, which suggested a negative control of LPS action. While studying the mechanism of this negative regulation, we found that in J774 cells, LPS activated both acid sphingomyelinase and neutral sphingomyelinase and moderately elevated ceramide, ceramide 1-phosphate, and sphingosine levels. Lowering of the acid sphingomyelinase and neutral sphingomyelinase activities using inhibitors or gene silencing upregulated TNF-α and MIP-2 production in J774 cells and macrophages. Accordingly, treatment of those cells with exogenous C8-ceramide diminished TNF-α and MIP-2 production after LPS stimulation. Exposure of J774 cells to bacterial sphingomyelinase or interference with ceramide hydrolysis using inhibitors of ceramidases also lowered the LPS-induced TNF-α production. The latter result indicates that ceramide rather than sphingosine suppresses TNF-α and MIP-2 production. Of these two cytokines, only TNF-α was negatively regulated by ceramide 1-phosphate as was indicated by upregulated TNF-α production after silencing of ceramide kinase gene expression. None of the above treatments diminished NO or RANTES production induced by LPS. Together the data indicate that ceramide negatively regulates production of TNF-α and MIP-2 in response to LPS with the former being sensitive to ceramide 1-phosphate as well. We hypothesize that the ceramide-mediated anti-inflammatory pathway may play a role in preventing endotoxic shock and in limiting inflammation

Keywords:
lipopolysaccharide, TNF alpha, MIP-2, ceramide. ceramide-1-phosphate, sphingomyelinase, J774, macrophages